FSTADP participants will engage with selected teaching and learning issues using varying modes of study as they examine their own teaching practice and their students' learning. A number of experienced academics from around the university will be involved in supporting and assessing the participants.
Eligibility
Access to the programme is limited to UWC Science post graduate students identified as ‘potential’ lecturers in their departments. Candidates will be selected after an interview by their respective Heads of Departments and Module coordinators prior to participation in the programme.No previous exposure to teaching in higher education is required.
Participants
The FSTADP is designed for Postgraduate students/tutors who intend to pursue a teaching career in higher education institutions but is also suitable for Science Further Education trainers.
Programme Structure
The programme consists of workshop sessions with learning tasks, teaching conversations, a small project and a portfolio of evidence.
Workshop sessions
These are sessions on a variety of learning and teaching topics .Assessment involves carrying out teaching tasks and submitting written reports.
Teaching Conversations
Focus on developing participants’ teaching through discussions with peers about their teaching beliefs and practices, teaching appraisals by senior academics and action planning. A summary of these activities kept as a blog is submitted for acknowledgement.
Group or Individual Project
Participants work in self-selected groups or individually on a small project concerning learning and teaching. The outcomes from the project are presented at the Faculty seminars for assessment.
Portfolio
A portfolio of evidence is the final assessment.
Participant Compliance Requirements
Each participant will be required to:
- Attend and participate in all programme activities.
- Read and keep up with tasks and learning activities provided and be prepared to enter own reflections as blog entries.
- Attend and keep records of all sessions and workshops given.
- Compile a portfolio of evidence for the participation experience in a Teaching Portfolio.
- the professional development of future science lecturers working in further or higher education.
- the enhancement of teaching practice underpinned by some knowledge of educational theory.
- the sharing and dissemination of good teaching practice.
Specific Outcomes and assessment criteria
1 Examine the UWC learning context |
|
Assessment Criteria
|
|
1.1
|
Factors characterising the UWC teaching and learning are identified.
|
1.2
|
Roles and departmental responsibilities of a lecturer at UWC are
reviewed.
|
1.3
|
Principles used in teaching own subject are developed using a variety
of credible sources.
|
2 Design authentic learning activities for a module |
|
Assessment Criteria
|
|
2.1
|
A learning activity that promotes deep understanding of science
concepts is developed.
|
The learning activity forms part of a module plan/course outline
addressing principles of learning with key features aligned.
Range: Key features include the
module purpose, specific outcomes, teaching & learning activities, assessment tasks & criteria, graduate
attributes
|
|
2.2
|
Information literacy components are incorporated into the learning
activity
|
2.3
|
The learning activities are designed to stimulate students to become
critical thinkers and good academic writers.
|
3 Facilitate learning in the classroom context (role play) |
|
Assessment Criteria
|
|
3.1
|
A teaching session plan is well developed and shows that all
resources and arrangements are in place.
|
3.2
|
The presentation displays clear and concise communication of facts,
concepts, ideas and principles relate to
the specific learning areas consistent with the requirements of the learning
area
|
3.3
|
The use of materials is fit -for -purpose.
|
4 Mark and Assess student work |
|
Assessment Criteria
|
|
4.1
|
Purposes and uses of different modes of assessment in Higher
Education are identified.
|
4.2
|
Key issues in designing assessments are examined.
|
4.3
|
The benefits of using assessment criteria are explained.
|
4.4
|
Good practice is employed when providing feedback to students
|
5 Identify a research problem/ opportunity related to the ECP programme |
|
Assessment Criteria
|
|
5.1
|
A research question/problem is constructed and communicated clearly
|
5.2
5.3 |
Authoritative resources are used to address the research problem
A possible plan of action is formulated. |
No comments:
Post a Comment